Opening hours: 8.45am - 6pm
London: 020 7520 6000 | East Anglia: 01245 280 880 | Out of hours: 07710 077 419

Letitia Egan

Call: 2019

    • Email
    • Direct phone

    Red Lion Chambers is a great set of chambers to work with. They are well respected and have an array of very talented counsel.

    Legal 500, 2022
    Letitia Egan

    Personal profile

    Letitia defends and prosecutes as both a junior alone and a led junior across the spectrum of criminal offences. She has recently acted in cases of Serious Violence, Drug Offences, Human Trafficking and other Serious & Organised Crime.

    Letitia prosecutes at CPS Grade 3 and has been instructed by the SFO as disclosure review counsel. She is therefore well versed in material-heavy cases and complex disclosure exercises.

    Letitia also accepts instructions in Regulatory & Professional Disciplinary proceedings, including defending for the Association of Optometrists.

    Crime

    Letitia has experience in all areas of criminal law.

    • R v MA (2024) – Led junior defending in a case of attempted murder, possession of firearms and PWITS Class A
    • R v  HB (2024) – Successful defence in a case of Dangerous Driving reliant on witness testimony from serving police officers
    • R v U & Ors (2024) –Prosecution junior in multi-handed Class A drugs conspiracy
    • R v AE (2024) – AE was unanimously acquitted of robbery
    • R v S & Ors (2023) – Prosecution junior in a multi-handed firearms conspiracy in which all defendants were convicted
    • R v C & Ors (2023) – Letitia represented D1 in a Flying Squad case concerning conspiracy to burgle ATMs
    • R v AA & Ors (2023) – Led junior defending a large-scale drugs conspiracy and successfully contested POCA proceedings
    • R v DS (2022) – DS was acquitted of domestic ABH despite being tried in absence.
    • R v VI (2022) – Letitia’s client was unanimously acquitted of Violent Disorder.

    Regulatory & Professional Disciplinary

    Featured Cases

    • GOC v TH (2024) – Letitia successfully appealed the Regulator’s refusal to admit her client to the register of student optometrists due to a criminal caution.
    • GOP v BS (2023) – No factual findings made against client accused of failing to detect glaucoma. No finding of impairment on admitted charges of poor record-keeping.

    Education

    • BPP Law School, 2018-2019
    • BPP Law School, Mar-Sept 2017
    • University of Sussex, 2011-2014
    • Sutton High School, 2006-2011

    Awards

    • Lloyd Jacob Memorial Award, Honourable Society of Middle Temple (2019)
    • Advocacy Scholar, BPP Law School (2018)
    • Diplock Scholar 2018 – Honourable Society of Middle Temple
    • BPP Law School Mooting Competition, Runner Up (2018)

    Memberships

    • CBA

    Other expertise