Theodore Burges
Call: 2023
Call: 2023
“Excellent criminal set with a justifiable reputation as a market leader.”
Legal 500, 2022

Theo has a busy practice defending in a range of criminal matters in both the Crown Court and Youth Court. He also prosecutes on behalf of the CPS.
Recent instructions have included defending in a burglary conspiracy valued at ~£250,000 as well as a s.18 GBH involving allegations of false imprisonment.
He has been praised as “absolutely fantastic, well prepared [and] articulate” by members of the judiciary. He is known for his excellent client care skills and engages productively with clients in challenging circumstances to secure best outcomes.
Theo is known for being a reliable and detailed-orientated junior and has been led by King’s Counsel in complex cases involving serious sexual allegations, often involving the review of voluminous and extensive material. Most recently, he was led in a high-profile death by dangerous driving case which considered issues relating to fitness.
Theo has developed particularly strong knowledge on the law of automatism, having assisted Jennifer Dempster KC throughout a complex homicide case from trial through to the Court of Appeal. As a result, he is well placed to advise on this complex area of law.
Theo also has a specific interest in National Security and Espionage Law. He has presented to the Criminal Bar Association on recent developments in the fields and The Guardian has invited him to write on the topic. He has also co-authored a number of articles with Barnaby Jameson KC and Sailesh Mehta on the impact of the National Security Act 2023 and is an active commentator on the subject.
Prior to his legal career, Theo worked at the Ministry of Defence advising on a variety of policy areas. Whilst living in Ghana, he worked at an international energy company assessing the impact of government legislation on company activities
Theo frequently represents defendants in both the Crown Court and Youth Court. His experience encompasses matters ranging from theft through to GBH. Theo routinely addresses the admissibility of evidence and is particularly well-versed in issues relating to res gestae evidence.
Theo also prosecutes on behalf of the Crown Prosecution Service as a Grade 2 panel advocate and also has experience of private prosecutions.
Theo has developed extensive knowledge of automatism, the National Security Act 2023, disclosure of third-party material, and the admissibility of foreign intercept evidence in POCA proceedings.
Featured Cases:
R. v S (2025)
R. v A and Others (2025)
R. v B (2024)
.R. v D – Peterborough Crown Court
R. v M – Snaresbrook Crown Court
R. v A – Stratford Magistrates’ Court
Theo is continuing to build his expertise in relation to Proceeds of Crime.
He has represented defendants during confiscation proceedings and has achieved significant results. He is well versed in identifying key issues and whether proceeds are indeed available.
He has also represented respondents who are subject to Account Freezing Orders and seek to challenge such orders; he is well aware of the complex nature of these matters and can advise on the unusual issues that often arise in relation to these types of proceedings.
Featured Case:
R. v H – Aylesbury Crown Court
• Contested Final POCA Confiscation Hearing – The Crown sought confiscation of ~£70,000. Following examination-in-chief of the defendant and submissions. Defence succeeded on all contested issues, reducing the Confiscation Order by ~£53,000.
Theo has represented defendants in the preliminary stages of proceedings in terrorism related cases. His experience has meant that he is able to identify potential issues and advise at an early stage.
Featured Cases:
R. v V (2024)– Westminster Magistrates’ Court
R. v R – Westminster Magistrates’ Court
• Secured conditional discharge in case involving a Schedule 7 (Terrorism Act 2000) stop.
Theo has appeared for appellants in licensing appeals in the Magistrates’ Court, particularly in relation to appeals against TFL.
How to Prosecute a Spy: The National Security Act 2023 in Context
Preventing Fraud: Better Together?
What do the Afghan leaks tell us about state secrecy in Britain? We’re entering a dangerous era
National Security v Open Justice: lessons from the Afghan Super-Injunction