Theodore Burges
Call: 2023
“An excellent set with massive strength in fraud and serious crime.”
Legal 500, 2022
Personal profile
Theo has a busy practice defending in a range of criminal matters in both the Crown Court and Youth Court. He also prosecutes on behalf of the CPS.
Recent instructions have included defending in a burglary conspiracy valued at ~£250,000 as well as a s.18 GBH involving allegations of false imprisonment.
He has been praised as “absolutely fantastic, well prepared [and] articulate” by members of the judiciary. He is known for his excellent client care skills and engages productively with clients in challenging circumstances to secure best outcomes.
Theo is known for being a reliable and detailed-orientated junior and has been led by King’s Counsel in complex cases involving serious sexual allegations, often involving the review of voluminous and extensive material. Most recently, he was led in a high-profile death by dangerous driving case which considered issues relating to fitness.
Theo has developed particularly strong knowledge on the law of automatism, having assisted Jennifer Dempster KC throughout a complex homicide case from trial through to the Court of Appeal. As a result, he is well placed to advise on this complex area of law.
Theo also has a specific interest in National Security and Espionage Law. He has presented to the Criminal Bar Association on recent developments in the field and The Guardian has invited him to write on the topic. He has also co-authored a number of articles with Barnaby Jameson KC and Sailesh Mehta on the impact of the National Security Act 2023 and is an active commentator on the subject.
Prior to his legal career, Theo worked at the Ministry of Defence advising on a variety of policy areas. Whilst living in Ghana, he worked at an international energy company assessing the impact of government legislation on company activities
Crime
Theo frequently represents defendants in both the Crown Court and Youth Court. His experience encompasses matters ranging from theft through to GBH.
Featured Cases:
R. v S (2025)
- Represented youth at trial for multiple knife-point robberies. The case engaged points of complex law in relation to jurisdiction.
R. v A and Others (2025)
- Appeared for the prosecution at trial in multi-handed knife-point robbery leading to multiple convictions.
R. v B (2024)
- Successfully represented male accused of assaulting former partner and her new partner along with theft of their phones. Acquitted unanimously of all counts in 35 minutes following 3 day trial.
.R. v D (2024)- Peterborough Crown Court
- Sentence in PWITS Class A – Suspended sentence for defendant found in possession of 138g of cocaine in 302 wraps.
R. v M (2024)- Snaresbrook Crown Court
- Sentence for Inciting a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity (non-penetrative) – Suspended sentence imposed despite 5 year staring point.
Terrorism
Theo has represented defendants in the preliminary stages of proceedings in terrorism related cases. His experience has meant that he is able to identify potential issues and advise at an early stage.
Featured Cases:
R. v R – Westminster Magistrates’ Court
• Conditional discharge in case involving a Schedule 7 (Terrorism Act 2000) stop.
R. v V (2024)– Westminster Magistrates’ Court
- Represented a defendant at application for extended detention. The defendant was alleged to have procured a firearm, possessed terrorist material and prepared acts of terrorism.
Proceeds of Crime and Confiscation
Theo is continuing to build his expertise in relation to Proceeds of Crime.
He has represented defendants during confiscation proceedings and has achieved strong results. He is well versed in identifying key issues and whether proceeds are indeed available.
He has also represented respondents who are subject to Account Freezing Orders and seek to challenge such orders; he is well aware of the complex nature of these matters and can advise on the unusual issues that often arise in relation to these types of proceedings.
Featured Case:
R. v H – Aylesbury Crown Court
• Contested Final POCA Confiscation Hearing – The Crown sought confiscation of ~£70,000. Following examination-in-chief of the defendant and submissions. Defence succeeded on all contested issues, reducing the Confiscation Order by ~£53,000.
Regulatory & Professional Disciplinary
Theo has appeared for appellants in licensing appeals in the Magistrates’ Court, particularly in relation to appeals against TFL.
Education
- BVS, The City Law School, Very Competent (2022)
- GDL, The University of Law (Bloomsbury), Distinction (2021)
- BSc. (Hons.) Politics and International Relations, The University of Bristol, First Class (2019)
Awards
- Lord Justice Holker Scholarship (2021), The Honourable Society of Gray’s Inn
- The City Law School Scholarship for Academic Excellence (2021), The City Law School
- Josephine Barnes Scholarship (2020), The Honourable Society of Gray’s Inn
Memberships
- The Criminal Bar Association
- Young Legal Aid Lawyers
- Young Fraud Lawyers Association
Publications
How to Prosecute a Spy: The National Security Act 2023 in Context
Preventing Fraud: Better Together?
What do the Afghan leaks tell us about state secrecy in Britain? We’re entering a dangerous era
National Security v Open Justice: lessons from the Afghan Super-Injunction